Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses judicial review of Minister for Justice’s decision to order the deportation of a Nigerian father to three Irish-born children on the grounds that the Minister properly considered the facts submitted and correctly carried out a balancing of rights and an examination of the proportionality of the decision in accordance with the principles laid down in case law.
Judicial review – Nigerian national applied for asylum in this State – claimed that his wife was deceased and that he was the father to three children – was arrested two weeks after his application in Northern Ireland in possession of false identity documents – ORAC refused his application – he brought an appeal – before his appeal was heard he began a relationship with another Nigerian asylum seeker – they had three children together – the parents withdrew their asylum applications and applied and were granted permission to reside in the State on the basis of their Irish born children – father was arrested in Northern Ireland for a series of alleged driving and fraud offences – father was sentenced for six months imprisonment suspended for a period of three years - applicant banned from driving for three years – father released from custody and re-entered the State – father’s file was under investigation by the Minister – Minister refused the father a renewal of his permission to remain in the State – father’s 45 convictions recorded in Northern Ireland were chronicled, as well as a further conviction in this jurisdiction for non-display of an NCT certificate - father had committed a substantial and significant number of offences outside the jurisdiction over a two-year period while he possessed legal residency in the State - he was also outside the State for a period of four months while awaiting trial – deportation order made against the father – father challenging the Minister’s decision to make a deportation order on the grounds that the failed to consider the full facts surrounding the fourth named applicant’s convictions and failed to properly consider the family circumstances of the applicants – stare decisis – constitutional and Convention rights of the children – proportionality.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.