Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has set aside permission previously granted for judicial review proceedings against the Minister, determining that the Minister does not hold legal responsibility for the alleged breaches of language rights in court proceedings. The applicant's claims, which included allegations of unreasonable delay and failure to provide court services in Irish, were not found to be legally attributable to the Minister. The Court emphasised that the relief sought and the grounds provided did not establish a reasonable cause of action against the Minister, and that the proceedings were certain to fail. The Court also noted that the State might bear responsibility, but the applicant did not express an intention to amend the proceedings or the relief granted, despite the opportunity to do so.
Judicial Review, Language Rights, Official Languages Act, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Inherent Jurisdiction, Minister's Legal Responsibility, Court Services, Unreasonable Delay, Right to a Fair Trial, Amendment of Proceedings, Public Prosecutor, Court Interpreter Services, Court of Appeal, High Court, Set Aside Permission, Strike Out Proceedings.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now