Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of High Court refusal to quash a decision by the Minister for Agriculture to give consent to an afforestation development in County Leitrim, on the grounds that, despite the fact that procedures were ineffective to give the applicant proper notice of the application prior to the closing date for public consultation, the trial judge was entitled to reach that conclusion that it would not be just to quash the approval decision because the Minister did in fact belatedly address the substance of the applicant’s concerns; and it would be unfair on a third party on the particular facts of the case to quash the approval.
Fair procedures – appeal of High Court refusal to quash a decision by the Minister to give consent to a particular afforestation development at Adoon, Gorvagh, Co. Leitrim – Article 5 of the European Communities (Forest Consent and Assessment) Regulations 2010 (S.I. 558 of 2010) – Mr. Curran was advised in the wake of the objection and the subsequent field inspection that certain portions of the site would be refused for a forestry scheme due to high water table and drainage issues – Directive 2011/92/EU (as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU) – Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (1998) – Aarhus Convention – publication requirements and fair procedures – s. 22(9)(c) of the Forestry Act 2014 – procedures provided for in the 2010 Regulations were in fact ineffective to give Mr. McCaffrey notice of the application prior to the closing date for public consultation – whether the applicant was given a meaningful opportunity to be heard after the close of the public consultation date – trial judge was entitled to reach that conclusion that it would not be just and proper to quash the approval decision – appeal dismissed.