Court of Appeal upholds the convictions of individuals involved in a brutal mob attack on security personnel enforcing a High Court repossession order. The original trial, which took place over several months, centered on the admissibility of video evidence and the legality of search warrants. The appellants' convictions for assault, false imprisonment, and other charges were affirmed, with the court rejecting arguments that the evidence was inadmissible or that the jury should have been discharged. The court emphasised the importance of focusing criminal trials on the issue of guilt and avoiding unnecessary examinations of police procedures that are irrelevant to the constitutional mandate of a jury trial.
Mob attack - security personnel - Court of Appeal - High Court repossession order - video evidence - search warrants - assault - false imprisonment - admissibility of evidence - jury trial - police procedures - criminal trial - convictions affirmed - Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 - Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 - Criminal Damage Act 1991 - Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994 - Animal Welfare Act 2013 - common design principle - reasonable suspicion - Constitution of Ireland - Article 38.