Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court, by way of a habeas corpus application, refuses to order the release of a Moldovan national who could not take up his bail, finding that the conduct of the District judge in not offering him time to pay a statutory fine was not unfair in all the circumstances since he had just arrived in this country with smuggled cigarettes and had no stated ties to this country.
Criminal law – Article 40.4.2 application – habeas corpus – s. 119 of the Finance Act 2001 – decision of the District Judge to fix a cash lodgement and independent surety with the minimum conditions of bail in the circumstances of the applicant having just arrived in the State was reasonable and appropriate – whether the District Judge, in not offering the applicant time to pay was disproportionate, unreasonable and unfair – applicant is in lawful custody.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.