Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants an order for an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant from trespass upon property, on the grounds that the defendant had drawn a loan to purchase the property as a residential investment, not as a primary home, and thus could not avail of the protections of the Mortgage Code of Conduct.
Interlocutory injunction sought to restrain trespass – Plaintiff received of Promontoria Finn – Plaintiff claims entitlement to the protection of the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears - Defendants claim the property to be their family home – Plaintiff claims it is not – Defendant not entitled to use Code of Conduct where she drew down a commercial mortgage for the purpose of purchasing a residential investment property – subsequently using that property as her residence irrelevant -in any event, was in breach of Clause 6 of the contract and thus the Mortgage Arrears Resolution Process does not apply – Defendant not denied monies due – damages would not be an adequate remedy for the Plaintiff where the Defendant cannot repay loan – Plaintiff has provided an undertaking as to damages – injunction granted
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now