Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court: (a) grants order striking out claim by borrower against a financial institution, a receiver, and the State, on the grounds that the claim made was 'incoherent and without any legal validity', and could not be 'saved' by any amendment to the pleadings; and (b) determines in response to motions issued by the borrower that there was no basis for alleging contempt of court or perjury on the part of the defendants or their solicitors.
Three related motions - whether defendants in contempt of court - whether to refer correspondence to An Garda Siochana - alleged perjury - application by defendants to strike out claim - loan - transferred to new financial institution - default - appointment of receiver - refusal of borrower to co-operate with receiver - claim for damages arising from failure to strike out summons - statement of claim - alleged breach of constitutional rights.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now