The Court of Appeal upholds the sentence of a principal figure in a large-scale investment fraud, affirming the original decision of the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court. The appellant, who had pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud, was sentenced to 6 years and 10 months imprisonment. The Court of Appeal found no error in the sentencing judge's determination of a 14-year headline sentence, which was reduced by 50% due to mitigating factors, including the appellant's guilty plea, remorse, and reduced circumstances. The Court emphasised the egregious nature of the fraud, the breach of trust, and the significant harm caused to nearly 200 victims, many of whom were elderly and suffered considerable financial and emotional distress. The Court rejected the appellant's arguments that the sentence was disproportionate compared to his co-accused and other similar cases, noting the exceptional scale of the fraud and the necessity for a deterrent message.
conspiracy to defraud, investment fraud, sentencing, Court of Appeal, Dublin Circuit Criminal Court, guilty plea, mitigation, breach of trust, victim impact, financial loss, emotional distress, elderly victims, headline sentence, proportionality, deterrence, retribution, liquidation, Custom House Capital Limited (CHC), European Arrest Warrant (EAW), Criminal Procedure Act 2021, investor compensation.