The High Court dismissed all claims brought by the plaintiff against the Courts Service, including allegations of negligence, fraud, breaches of duty, and data protection rights. The court found no evidence to support any of the allegations, determining that the proceedings were frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process, predominantly amounting to repeated attempts to relitigate issues previously decided by the courts. Furthermore, the court granted an Isaac Wunder order, restricting the plaintiff from taking further proceedings against the Courts Service without prior court permission, citing a longstanding pattern of unfounded and repetitive litigation. The court noted the plaintiff’s refusal to engage constructively with court processes and his abusive conduct during the proceedings.
motion to dismiss – motion to amend – negligence – bad faith – fraud – breach of duty – data protection rights – abuse of process – frivolous and vexatious – Isaac Wunder order – Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC) – collateral attack – Central Office – judicial review – extension of time – relitigation – strike out – litigant in person