Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court, in a dispute over the construction of a new children’s hospital, in which the Plaintiff seeks a declaration of validity of an instruction given by it to the Defendant on 8 January 2019 to commence the Phase B Works, and where the validity or otherwise of the Phase B Instruction is of central importance for both the timing and the final cost of the project, grants the Defendant an order for discover in respect of certain categories of documents, but refuses others.
Construction dispute - children's hospital, Phase B Works - contract interpretation - Adjusted Contract Sum - Guaranteed Maximum Price - design completion - Phase B Instruction validity - pre-Phase B Engagement Process - discovery application - contract clauses - project delays - design coordination - Building Information Model (BIM) - dispute resolution - conciliation - damages claim - counterclaim.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.