High Court remits an asylum seeker's case for reconsideration after finding that the International Protection Office (IPO) made an incorrect assessment of her nationality. Initially, the applicant provided misleading information, claiming South African nationality, but later, with legal advice, submitted authentic Zimbabwean documents. The IPO's decision was based on the initial misinformation and failed to accurately consider the new evidence, leading to the application being processed under an accelerated procedure due to South Africa being deemed a safe country of origin.
Asylum seeker - nationality error - International Protection Office (IPO) - International Protection Appeals Tribunal (IPAT) - Zimbabwean documents - South African identity - accelerated decision-making process - credible evidence - remittal for reconsideration - judicial review - material error - country of origin information - authenticity of documents - refugee status - subsidiary protection - legal advice - misrepresentation.