Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court dismisses an appeal for an interlocutory injunction by neighboring landowners against the sale of a property, affirming the Circuit Court's decision, on the grounds that there was a serious issue to be tried regarding trespass; but the court dismisses the adverse possession claim as the registered owner's consent negated the possibility of such a claim.
Interlocutory injunction - trespass - adverse possession - consent of landowner - sale of property - notice of dispute - boundary discrepancy - legal principles for injunctions - Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation v. Clonmel Healthcare Ltd - balance of justice - adequacy of damages - mandatory relief - prohibitory injunction - trespass claim - High Court - Circuit Court - Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 - Start Mortgages DAC - Irish Life and Permanent plc - online auction - receiver injunctions - folio recalibration - ESB bill - pro forma contract for sale - bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.