Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of the severity of a sentence of four years with the final year suspended imposed for robbery at knifepoint finding that the net custodial sentence of three years for this type of offence was not unduly harsh.
Criminal law – sentencing – appeal of severity of four years with the final year suspended imposed for robbery – s. 14 of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 – whether the sentencing judge erred in principle holding that there was an element of planning in the robbery in the absence of any evidence of same – whether the sentencing judge erred in principle in holding that the offence fell into the upper range – whether the sentence imposed was unduly severe – net custodial sentence of three years for this type of offence is not unduly harsh – appeal dismissed
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.