Injunction granted restraining sale of parcels of land where it is alleged that the purported sale is in excess of the powers of receiver

Application for an injunction to prevent a proposed sale of a number of parcels of land - this arises from secured borrowings which the Plaintiff had with the first-named Defendant’s predecessor, Allied Irish Banks, and the appointment of the Second-named Defendant as receiver over the lands by the First-named Defendant - correct approach to an application for a prohibitory interlocutory injunction was set down in Campus Oil v Minister for Industry and Energy (No. 2) [1983] IR 88), was restated in Okunade v Minister for Justice & Ors [2012] 3 IR 152 and was recalibrated by the Supreme Court in Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Clonmel Healthcare [2019] IESC 65 - whether there is a fair question to be tried - Plaintiff argues that the Second-named Defendant was exceeding his powers by purporting to exercise a power of sale as he appears to have carriage of the sale and he is stated in the draft contract to be vendor (as Receiver, on behalf on the Plaintiff) - arguable case that the purported sale is in excess of the Second-named Defendant's powers - balance of convenience.