No basis to allege that tribunal did not consider cultural context of Algerian’s international protection claim

Asylum and immigration – judicial review – Algerian national challenging the decision refusing him international protection – employer engaged in fraudulent practices and misappropriation - left Algeria to go to France on holidays – learned that he was being accused of misappropriation by his employer – did not contact the employer in order to protest his innocence - adverse credibility findings – refused international protection – appeal dismissed – proceedings issued - complaint that the tribunal should not have had regard to his failure to engage with alleged actor of persecution – whether or not the applicant contacts the person from whom he says he fears harm or whether or not he entertains that person’s attempts to make contact, is a part of the facts and circumstances of the case and cannot be arbitrarily disregarded - having regard to such a matter is not an error of law, fatal or otherwise - alleged failure by the tribunal to provide reasons why he would not be subject to harm in the context of a claim of unethical practices - premise of this ground is misconceived - no actual finding that the employer had bribed and blackmailed a tax official in the past – no obligation to make such a finding - tribunal did find reasons as to why the unethical and fraudulent practices of the company would not translate into harm to him - there was no reason why he would have fallen under suspicion – alleged failure to provide reasons - alleged lack of evidence to support finding that the employer is not violent - point does not arise because the claim of blackmail and threats was not specifically accepted by the tribunal – alleged failure to appreciate the cultural context or engaging in speculation or conjecture - making an adverse decision is not to be equated with failing to appreciate the cultural context or with giving vent to gut feelings - no basis to say that the tribunal did not consider the cultural context - country of origin information was considered and the decision makes that explicit – judicial review refused –