High Court refuses applicant costs of a leave application in moot judicial review proceedings, on the grounds that the costs of the application were already dealt with in the order granting leave, which provided that the costs of the leave application shall not recoverable unless papers were served within seven days, and the papers were not served within seven days - nor was an application made to vary the order.
Asylum and immigration – judicial review – costs of legal proceedings – moot proceedings - agreed that the applicant is to get costs of the proceedings up to the date of the state’s open offer - costs of the leave hearing is the only point of contention – wording of the order – practice direction – papers should be served within seven days – otherwise costs of leave application not recoverable - delay in serving papers – one day - town agents had not informed themselves either of the currently applicable procedures more generally, or more specifically of the terms of the order in this particular case - clearly provided in the Practice Direction that the default terms will apply unless otherwise ordered - no particular injustice has been shown to the applicant - not disputed on behalf of the applicant that the papers could have been served in time - complaint is also made that a generic order was applied without individualised judicial consideration – court willing to entertain and consider any application to vary the default terms set out in the Practice Direction – no application made – prejudice to the defendant - no force majeure - costs of the leave application have already been disposed of - the applicant did not make any application or submission to disapply the default wording - default wording was adopted - application for costs of the leave hearing is totally misconceived – costs of the costs application follow the event – set off – stayed pending appeal –