High Court refuses application for an order of certiorari of a conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in circumstances where the appellant’s van had overturned on the highway, on the grounds that it was clear that there was no misdescription of the location of the alleged offence in the summons, and judge was entitled to reach that conclusion.
Criminal law – judicial review – certiorari to quash order which affirmed conviction imposed in the District Court – driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor – appellant’s van had overturned on the highway and come to rest in a ditch opposite the entrance of a housing estate – at conclusion of evidence, appellant submitted that the case should be dismissed because the evidence had not disclosed that the accused had been driving at the location specified – appeal judge ruled against defence submission and proceeded to affirm conviction imposed in the District Court – whether there was a clear defect in the summons in relation to the location – whether judge erred in failing to amend the summons and therefore dealt with the matter without jurisdiction – clear that there was no misdescription of the location of the alleged offence in the summons – judge was entitled to reach that conclusion – refusal of reliefs sought.