No entitlement to make review application at later stage having failed to seek review within the statutory time-limit

Asylum and immigration – judicial review – Albanian national refused asylum – application for leave to remain refused - appealed the protection refusal – appeal rejected – no review of permission to remain decision – judicial review of protection refusal - temporary residence permission had now ended - the issuing of judicial review proceedings or even the subsequent grant of leave does not amount to a stay on the process unless the court so orders – High Court disposed of his arguments in other proceedings – withdrew judicial review - submitted a purported review application – extension not sought - can only have one review – change of circumstances only in application to revoke deportation order - inaccurate to say that the applicant had already had a review - Minister then made a deportation order – challenge to the deportation order – Minister’s claim that there is no decision here - court has to have whatever jurisdiction is necessary to review the legality of the approach taken by executive and administrative bodies - whether the approach taken by the public body is lawful or not – whether the IPO unlawfully failed to consider the purported review application - there was no valid review application - one cannot assert an entitlement to make a review application at some later stage having failed to take up the option for review within the statutory time-limit or having exercised that option unsuccessfully -no prejudice - did not trigger the review and so the Minister had no obligation to conduct a review - futility of the application - IPO simply does not have such a jurisdiction to consider a review after that happens – no benefit – judicial review refused