No error of law in decision deeming asylum application to be inadmissible where applicant had obtained refugee status in Greece previously

Asylum and immigration – judicial review – European law - obtained refugee status in Greece – left and came to this state by way of France - applied for asylum - falsely asserted that he had not been granted asylum elsewhere - could not be returned to Greece because the Greeks declined to accept him - application having already been finalised – application deemed inadmissible – appealed to International Protection Appeals Tribunal – appeal dismissed – proceedings issued - applicability of Section 5 of Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 - should the tribunal consider conditions in a country that has granted asylum previously when considering whether a protection application is admissible – irrationality - decision is a purely factual assessment of the material before the tribunal and was well within what was open to the tribunal in such circumstances – lack of reasons - reasons are sufficient in the circumstances - alleged failure to apply ECHR caselaw - not a proper ground for judicial review – whether there was an error in relying on the applicant’s failure to provide evidence - assessment of the evidence is quintessentially a matter for the decision-maker – no error of law demonstrated – whether there was an illegality in failing to hold an oral hearing or failing to put the tribunal’s specific concerns to the applicant – whether the Tribunal should have sought assurances or further information from Greece - system of mutual confidence – judicial review refused –