Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses leave to appeal decision rejecting challenge to the decision refusing permissions to remain and the subsequent deportation order, on the grounds that the points raised are a combination of rudimentary misunderstandings of the meaning of statutory language, fact-specific confusion, falsely-premised assertion and tendentious argument; and the Court, in light of the fact that its concerns as to the genuineness of a document were not addressed, directs the Minister for Justice to deliver the papers to the Garda Síochána to enable all appropriate inquiries to be made.
Asylum and immigration – judicial review – application for leave to appeal – High Court refused challenge to the decision refusing permission to remain and the consequent deportation orders- law in relation to leave to appeal – fact specific question – no dispute as to the difference between s. 49(3) and the narrower terms of art. 8 of the ECHR - points that have already been clarified at appellate level - factual premise of the second question is simply inaccurate – leave to appeal refused concerns about the genuineness of document not addressed - questionable document should be properly investigated – Minister to deliver the papers to the Garda Síochána to enable all appropriate inquiries to be made .
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only e-mail alert service for all Irish judgments over the past 13 years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now