No illegality apparent in decision refusing Zimbabwean national international protection

Asylum and immigration – judicial review – Zimbabwean national challenging the decision refusing her international protection – claimed that she was raped and abducted – relocated to South Africa – entered the State and applied for international protection – application refused - accepted her account of abuse but held that there was an internal protection alternative available – gave two addresses - full papers had not been exhibited at leave application - grounds of challenge – no illegality apparent – alleged irrationality as to safety of the internal protection alternative - tribunal gave detailed reasons for internal protection being available - five steps envisaged – alleged irrationality as to the reasonableness of her availing of internal protection – alleged failure to apply UNHCR guidelines - UNHCR guidelines are not law and even if they were not applied that does not give rise to grounds for judicial review – judicial review refused –