Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has refused to restrain the deportation of an individual, upholding the previous decision that the appeal to the International Protection Appeals Tribunal (IPAT) did not carry a suspensive effect on the deportation order. The court found no evidence of a real risk to the applicant's fundamental rights if returned to Georgia, and noted that the applicant could apply for revocation of the deportation order if successful in judicial review proceedings. The court emphasised that the least risk of injustice lies in allowing the deportation order to take effect, considering the absence of a suspensive effect from judicial review and the possibility of the applicant's return to the State to process any subsequent applications for international protection.
injunction, deportation, International Protection Act 2015, IPAT, IPO, judicial review, fundamental rights, risk of harm, Georgia, safe country, suspensive effect, Procedures Directive, access to court, revocation of deportation order, international protection application.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now