No legal deficiency in decision refusing EU citizen’s application for visas for wife and son

Asylum and immigration – judicial review – European Law – EU treaty rights – EU citizen challenging the decision refusing his application for visas for his wife and son - number of adjournments – marked preemptory against the applicant – adjournment application refused – litigant in person - stated that he was living and working in Ireland and wanted his wife and son to join/reside with him in Ireland - right of residence – freedom of movement - any derivative right of his wife/son to join him, was dependent on proof of satisfaction of the statutory conditions – visa applications refused – appeals were unsuccessful - reliefs sought and complaints made - Minister has the right to restrict the use of free movement rights under European Union law in circumstances of abuse of rights - Minister was entitled at law, and on the evidence before him, to make the findings and reach the conclusions that he made and reached – no meaningful effort to explain the inconsistencies or dispute the facts identified by the Minister – abuse of process - no legal deficiency presents in the impugned visa appeal refusals or the related decision-making process – judicial review refused –