Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court makes no order as to costs in interlocutory injunction which did not proceed and where that the substantive issues are very unlikely to be litigated.
Costs of legal proceedings - interlocutory injunction – application did not proceed - ongoing dispute would be referred to arbitration – background facts - injunction restraining the Defendant, its servants or agents from placing a lock on premises – undertaken given - parties agreed that it should only proceed as a dispute about costs on the basis that the substantive issues are very unlikely to be litigated - law in relation to costs - whether the matter is approached on the basis that there was an event or not the appropriate way to deal with the costs of the injunction application is to make no order as to costs – no determination – precipitous - conduct of the Plaintiff in not contacting the Defendant either directly or through solicitors until late afternoon on the Thursday was to severely limit the ability of the Defendant to seek legal advice - costs of the costs hearing – no order as to costs
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.