Not unfair for Minister to have refused interview or oral hearing in deportation case

Judicial review – asylum and immigration – Nigerian national challenging the decision of the Minister for Justice refusing him subsidiary protection and ordering his deportation – points previously rejected by the High Court - boilerplate pleadings – argument that protection would be available did not flow from the country of origin information dismissed - no obligation on a decision-maker to consider points made narratively or to reply to an applicant point-by-point - complaint is made that the internal relocation decision is not in accordance with the UNHCR guidelines - guidelines are not the law in any event – no breach in fair procedures – internal relocation decision lawful - reliance at the subsidiary protection stage on credibility findings at the asylum stage - a reassessment of the credibility finding would require four elements - not unfair for the Minister not to have allowed an interview or oral hearing - no substance to arguments made - State protection is available, and that there is a functioning police force in Nigeria does flow from the premises - lawful subsidiary protection refusal – judicial review refused.