Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has ordered the committal to prison of the occupant of a property, following her refusal to comply with a previous High Court order to vacate after the property had been lawfully repossessed by a financial institution. The occupant had unlawfully re-entered and remained in the property after a lawful transfer of the mortgage and subsequent possession order. Despite various arguments presented by the occupant, the court found them to be without merit and confirmed the lawfulness of the possession orders and the financial institution's standing. The decision affirms the principle of finality in litigation and the importance of adhering to court orders.
Trespass, contempt of court, High Court order, possession order, financial institution, mortgage transfer, property repossession, procedural justice, finality in litigation, County Registrar, Rules of the Superior Courts, Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC, penal endorsement, attachment and committal, European Convention of Human Rights, Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009, Supreme Court determination, Circuit Court Rules, Order 5B, Courts and Courts Officers Act 1995.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.