Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal upholds the High Court's decision that the appellant was not entitled to offset overpayments made to the Revenue Commissioners against sums due, as the claims for set-off were made outside the statutory four-year time limit. The appellant, who operated a sand and gravel business, had failed to file statutory returns for VAT, PAYE, and PRSI between 2003-2010, resulting in overpayments based on estimates served by the Revenue. The appellant's defense was that he was entitled to offset these overpayments against his tax liabilities. However, the court found that the appellant's claims for set-off were time-barred and that the correspondence between the parties could not extend the mandatory statutory period for making such claims. The court also concluded that the appellant had been given credit for certain overpayments, and that the Revenue Commissioners had not erred in their application of payments and credits.
Overpayment - Revenue Commissioners - Setoff - Statutory time limit - VAT (Value Added Tax) - PAYE (Pay As You Earn) - PRSI (Pay Related Social Insurance) - Tax liabilities - Tax returns - High Court - Court of Appeal - Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 - VAT Consolidation Act 2010 - Interest - Audit - Revenue Sheriff - Appeal Commissioners - Estoppel.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.