High Court, in professional negligence proceedings, dismisses that part of the claim for breach of contract and a retainer by the defendant engineer in the construction of the plaintiffs' dwelling house 10 years previously which related to alleged assurances and representations regarding the recommendation of a builder under the contract, in circumstances where the lapse of time resulted in the defendant being unable, at this late remove, to recall conversations regarding such representations which did not form apart of the original claim but came about through a subsequent reply to particulars.
Application to dismiss proceedings on grounds of delay - want of prosecution - Order 36 rule 12(b) RSC - professional negligence action concerning retainer of chartered engineer in connection with construction of dwelling - set down for trial in 2012 but further issues remained in relation to particulars - non-reply to late tender offer - whether no steps taken since case set down for trial - ten years since construction of dwelling - applicable legal principles - whether delay inordinate - whether satisfactory excuse for delay - defendant's conduct - no excuse for delay of expert in furnishing report - no excuse for failure to take action after notice of trial struck out - not excusable that no reply was provided to notice of tender - explanation must be one which excuses the delay - balance of justice - defendant took no procedural steps to remedy failure by plaintiffs to serve formal notice for particulars - alleged prejudice to defendant - likely or probable - passage of time's effect on fabric of building and a link between alleged failures of construction due to plaintiffs' occupation - alleged inherent defects crystallised at date of final certification - no expert evidence to suggest passage of time and normal wear and tear cannot be understood and isolated from inherent defects - difficulty in recalling conversations as to representations and assurances - no evidence shown of defendant's difficulty in obtaining professional indemnity insurance in intervening period - claim of loss of documents is speculative - defendant cannot be fairly required to answer claim based on an alleged failure to advise plaintiffs of chosen builder's insurance cover - unjust to plaintiff to dismiss claim which is ready for trial - claim to be confined to breach of contract and retainer