High Court sets aside a determination of the Labour Court in favour of a part-time teacher's claim of less favourable treatment in respect of her conditions of employment, on the grounds that it had erred in law in finding that she was entitled to choose an inappropriate comparator.
Employment law - appeal from the Labour Court - School seeking determination on a point of law of Labour Court decision pursuant to s.17(6) of Protection of Employees (Part Time Work) Act 2001 – respondent a part-time teacher at appellant school – school mostly employs teachers paid by the Department of Education – school also employs teachers, including respondent, whom they pay directly – teacher works 14 hours per week - Department requires teachers to perform certain work outside of school hours in same manner as comparable full-time teachers – respondent required to work up to an additional 33 hours each year - additional hours are not pro-rata by reference to the respondent’s part-time hours/salary – teacher’s proportionate additional hours are greater than those of full-time teachers - brought complaint before Rights Commissioner that she had been treated less favourably in respect of her pay, pension and other conditions of employment than another teacher paid by the Department – claim upheld by Rights Commissioner and on appeal by Labour Court – whether appeal to the High Court was appropriate –whether the comparator nominated by respondent was appropriate pursuant to s.7 of 2001 Act – comparator and the part-time teacher must have same employer - whether case should be referred to Court of Justice of the European Union.