Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The Court of Appeal upheld the decision to revoke a permanent residence card previously granted to an individual, affirming the High Court's judgment. The revocation was based on the finding that the individual had provided false and misleading information regarding his spouse's employment in Ireland, which was material to his application for the card. The Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court that the appellant had given adequate reasons for the decision, and that a standalone proportionality assessment was not required in cases where rights are claimed based on fraudulent activity. The original decision to revoke the card was deemed proportionate to the abuse of rights established.
Permanent Residence Card - Revocation - False Information - Misleading Documentation - Court of Appeal - High Court - Proportionality Assessment - Fraudulent Activity - Abuse of Rights - Adequate Reasons - Judicial Review - European Communities (Free Movement of Persons) Regulations - Directive 2004/38/EC - Immigration - Residence Rights - EU Treaty Rights - Childminding Employment - Material Fact.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.