Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court dismissed an application seeking to quash a planning authority's decision to grant permission for the construction of a telecommunications mast near a railway station and protected structure. The applicant argued that the application was invalid due to inadequate plans, insufficient public notice, misapplication of planning policies and guidelines, and a failure to carry out environmental impact assessment. The court found that any technical shortcoming in the application documents was immaterial or not proven, that public notice requirements were met or non-compliance was not substantiated, and that the decision maker was entitled to interpret the relevant planning guidelines and to consider the project outside the category of 'urban development' under the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive. The court emphasised the high threshold for overturning such decisions, the significance of materiality and discretion, and the applicant's failure to discharge the onus of proof. The proceedings were dismissed and no order for costs was made, subject to submissions.
judicial review – planning permission – telecommunications mast – environmental impact assessment – protected structure – public notice – Planning and Development Act 2000 – Planning and Development Regulations 2001 – interpretation of guidelines – materiality – onus of proof – discretion – certiorari – Aarhus Convention – Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC) – impacts on heritage – urban development – Annex II EIA Directive
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only e-mail alert service for all Irish judgments over the past 13 years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now