Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court: (a) adjourns an application from the defendant to hold a preliminary hearing as to whether a claim is statute barred, in circumstances where the Plaintiff relies on a statutory defence relating to the concealment of fraud but did not provide particulars relating to that defence or plead it correctly; and (b) orders that the plaintiff do so within 21 days.
Plaintiff suing for breach of contract and negligence regarding the management of an investment fund – full defence entered – first named defendant alleges plaintiff’s claim is statute barred – seeks preliminary hearing – plaintiff seeks to rely on statutory defence relating to concealment of fraud – raised only in general terms in replying affidavit – no particulars delivered – no reply from defendant – premature to direct trial of preliminary issue – adjourned generally, plaintiff to provide particulars within 21 days.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.