Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court dismisses plaintiff's claim that a lease was unlawfully altered, and that An Garda Síochána failed to investigate certain criminal complaints properly, on the grounds that the claim is frivolous and vexatious; and the court restrains the plaintiff from instituting any further proceedings against any named defendants, on the grounds that: 1) the proceedings relate to the same issues raised by the plaintiff in previous proceedings issued in the Circuit Court; and 2) the plaintiff has sought to relitigate matters which have already been litigated and settled by him and his father.
Practice and procedure – O. 19, r. 28 of the Rules of the Superior Courts – dismissal of the plaintiff’s claim against the defendants on the grounds that it is an abuse of process – failure to disclose any reasonable cause of action – past litigation concerning the lease – the plaintiff’s criminal complaint – whether the plaintiff has continued to litigate the same claim dating from the Circuit Court proceedings in 2005 in a variety of actions against a large number of defendants – proceedings relate to the same issues raised by the plaintiff in previous proceedings issued in the Circuit Court – plaintiff seeks to question the finality of the Supreme Court’s judgment by suggesting he could amend his pleadings to include misfeasance – Isaac Wunder Order – plaintiff restrained from the institution of any proceedings against named defendants.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only fast reporting service for all Irish judgments over the past ten years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now