Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court determines that proceedings seeking to enforce an equitable mortgage are statute-barred, on the grounds that: (a) any proceedings should have been instituted within two years of the date of death of the mortgagor on 25 August 2011; and (b) the mortgagee's cause of action had accrued once the prescribed repayment date had passed without the overdraft facility being cleared in full.
High Court - banking law - proceedings to enforce an equitable mortgage in respect of unregistered land - well charging order sought and order for the sale of the land - section 8 of the Civil Liability Act 1961 - Statute of Limitations Act 1957 - loan agreement entered into by borrowers in 2008 - security for the loan agreement was an equitable deposit held over title deeds to commercial property - sum was not repaid - first borrower died intestate in August 2011 - defendant was the personal representative of the first borrower and took out letters of administration in November 2019 - demand for repayment was sent in April 2020 - second borrower died in December 2016 - proceedings were instituted in June 2020 - whether the mortgagee's cause of action was subsisting as of the date of death of the mortgagor - if so, proceedings should have been instituted within two years of the date of death - proceedings were not commenced until almost nine years had elapsed since the date of death - no mortgage deed - cause of action had accrued once the prescribed repayment date had passed without the overdraft facility being cleared in full - any proceedings seeking to enforce the equitable mortgage should have been instituted within two years of the date of death of the mortgagor in August 2011 - claim was statute-barred
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.