Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court (in three cases) grants orders directing property arbitrators to state questions of law for determination by the High Court, where the Electricity Supply Board (ESB) had exercised its statutory right to place electric lines across private lands, and had made unconditional offers for compensation prior to arbitration, the questions including: (a) whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to depart from an offer including costs that had been accepted by a property owner; (b) whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to impose a time limit on acceptance of an offer, where no such term had been included in the offer; (c) whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction when it came to costs to fix a date by which the offer should have been accepted; (d) whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to determine issues of fact and law in a claim which had been settled; and (e) whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to determine issues of fact and law without hearing any evidence, or affording the ESB the opportunity to be heard.
Electricity Supply Board - statutory power to place electric lines across private lands - compensation assessed by property arbitrator - Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation) Act, 1919 - application for orders directing property arbitrators to state cases to High Court - unconditional offer - costs where award of arbitrator does not exceed unconditional offer - Electricity (Supply) Act 1927 - S. 35 of the Arbitration Act of 1954 - power of court to direct arbitrator to state a question of law - irrationality - case stated requirements - whether letter making second unconditional offer was valid - determination by arbitrator that a second offer was only valid if the first offer had been explicitly withdrawn.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.