Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Proposed deportee had failed to notify Minister of his whereabouts
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses leave to appeal a decision refusing judicial review of a deportation order, on the grounds that: (a) no point of law of exceptional public importance was identified; and (b) the applicant had abused the system in leaving his direct provision accommodation and in failing to notify the Minister of his whereabouts, and it was not in the public interest that he be permitted to proceed further.
Judicial review – asylum and immigration – application for leave to appeal - where an applicant fails to furnish an address at which he can be served, is the Minister thereby precluded from proceeding to make a deportation order against him? - principles applying to leave to appeal from a leave refusal - statutory interpretation – whether the Court interpreted statute correctly - applicant by his conduct has waived any entitlements under the statute - flagrantly disregarded his obligations and repudiated the legal basis of his presence in the State such that the court can exercise discretion against him - not in the public interest that an applicant who has fundamentally abused the system should be permitted to proceed further by way of appeal to challenge a situation which he brought about himself – application for leave to appeal refused –
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
