Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses leave to judicially review the decision of the Minister for Justice to order the deportation of four persons, on the grounds that the proposed grounds to challenge the decision, namely, whether a deportation order is legal in circumstances where it fails to specify a date by which the applicant must leave the State, had been dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Judicial review – asylum and immigration – application for leave – four applicants challenging the decision of the Minister for Justice to order their deportation – seeking injunctions restraining the deportations pending the determination of the proceedings – argued that the deportation orders were invalid for not specifying when the applicant is to leave the State – whether the deportation order is legal in circumstances where it fails to specify a date by which the applicant must leave the State - already been succinctly dealt with by the Supreme Court - no substance whatever in any submission that there is inadequacy – judicial comity - complains that the Supreme Court judgment was not sufficiently reasoned – High Court dismissed this argument – leave to judicially review refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.