Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court granted an application by a court-appointed guardian ad litem for a protective costs order in judicial review proceedings brought by a statutory child and family agency. The order shields the guardian ad litem from the risk of having to pay the agency's legal costs, irrespective of the outcome of the substantive proceedings. The court ruled that this protection was justified because the proceedings raised a point of law of general public importance regarding the scope of the District Court's powers over child welfare directions, and because the guardian ad litem, acting not for personal benefit but to ensure the child's interests were represented, would otherwise be deterred from participating due to the potential adverse costs. The agency had sought to attach conditions to costs protection that would have curtailed the guardian's statutory rights, which the court rejected. The court emphasised the essential adversarial role of the guardian ad litem in the proceedings and awarded her the costs of the successful application for the protective costs order.
protective costs order – guardian ad litem – judicial review – District Court jurisdiction – child welfare directions – legal costs protection – public interest litigation – statutory interpretation – Child and Family Agency – section 26 Child Care Act 1991 – Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 – Order 84 RSC – Article 42A of the Constitution – best interests of the child – legitimus contradictor (proper contradictor)
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.