Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal allows appeal against conviction for rape offences and invites submissions from the parties as to whether or not a retrial should be ordered, upholding one ground of appeal only, being that there was a material misdirection concerning what evidence was capable of supporting or corroborating the complainant’s evidence, and dismissing all other grounds of appeal, finding that: (a) the trial judge dealt appropriately with the issue of adverse pre-trial publicity; (b) the interviews with the appellant were all correctly admitted into evidence; and (c) there was no error made in refusing to withdraw the case from the jury.
Appeal against conviction for rape offences - appellant in relationship with complainant - had one child together and complainant was pregnant at time of some of the alleged offences - video footage from appellant's phone obtained showing anal penetration of the complainant on earlier occasions while she was unconscious or asleep - appellant alleged that complainant had consented and denied drugging her - previous trial at which appellant was convicted of sexual assault but no verdict reached on the rape counts - retrial of the rape counts, six weeks after sentencing hearing for sexual assault - whether trial judge erred in refusing to postpone appellant's trial due to adverse publicity - whether trial judge erred in determinations, rulings and directions in respect of corroboration - whether trial judge erred in his ruling concerning the admissibility of the appellant’s interviews - whether trial judge erred in his rulings, determinations and directions in respect of complaint evidence - whether trial judge erred in refusing to withdraw the charges from the jury - whether trial judge erred in respect of the requisitions raised - whether cumulative effect of the alleged errors made by the trial judge rendered the verdict unfair in all the circumstances.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only fast reporting service for all Irish judgments over the past ten years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now