Reasons for refusing Albanian national international protection were manifest from tribunal’s decision

Asylum and immigration – judicial review – challenge to the decision refusing Albanian national international protection – application to extend time – legal grounds - questionnaire - IPO decision - tribunal’s decision - duty to give reasons - no question of the Tribunal not having rationally analysed and fairly weighed the evidence and there is no question of the Tribunal having made any error of fact - reasons for the decision stemmed from the lack of evidence to warrant a fear of persecution coupled with adverse findings with regard to the so-called effects on the applicant’s health of his core claim, when the medical document was considered - evaluation of the evidence which the Tribunal engaged in can very clearly be understood as can the conclusion which the Tribunal reached and the basis for same - decision maker found a consistent absence of evidence of persecution - reasons for the Tribunal’s conclusion are manifest from a reading of the decision as a whole - open to the Tribunal to make a finding that the applicant was not threatened by supporters of the Democratic Party - no unfairness in relation to the assessment of the evidence by the Tribunal - has not demonstrated that the Tribunal erred in law by failing to give reasons for its decision in accordance with the requirements of natural and constitutional justice and/or by issuing a decision which was made without any evidential foundation for the conclusion reached – judicial review refused –