Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses judicial review of decision refusing a Sudanese national a visa to re-enter the State, on the grounds that the reasons offered for the refusal were entirely clear.
Judicial review – asylum and immigration – Sudanese national challenging decision refusing him permission to re-enter the State – over-stayed his visa – deportation order made – deportation order revoked - elected to return to Sudan - applied for a visa to re-enter Ireland – application refused – alleged failure to provide adequate reasons - ministerial decisions are not rendered in a factual vacuum - obligation to give a reasoned decision does not entail an obligation to give an essay-long consideration of each aspect of the application which precedes such decision – must have regard to context - entirely clear why the Impugned Decision was made - decision not in any way irrational or unreasonable or otherwise presents any issue at law – judicial review refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.