Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses judicial review of the decision refusing to admit the applicant to the Juvenile Diversion Programme, on the grounds that the applicant’s fair procedure rights were not breached, and the reasons offered for the decision were adequate.
Judicial review – challenge to the decision refusing to admit the Applicant to the Juvenile Diversion Programme – duty to give reasons – leave granted – grounds – the diversion programme - margin of discretion – chronology - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides that every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union – reasons offered – decision made and communicated - short form without a discursive explanation - context in which reasons were given in this case – legal principles – not entitled to relief – fair procedure rights not breached – reasons offered were adequate –
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now