Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants confirmatory orders reflecting a special resolution of a company permitting the reduction of its share capital in accordance with statutory provisions, on the grounds that: numerous objections lodged by a purported 'creditor' of the company are without merit; the objector is not in fact a 'creditor' of the company; and the improper use of alleged 'expert evidence' by the purported creditor means the court could not rely on the purported evidence advanced.
Application to confirm company's special resolution approving a reduction in company's capital - opposition by purported creditor - company complied with statutory requirements - no basis for grounds of objection - no issue of EU law which requires assistance from CJEU - relief sought by company to confirm approval of resolution permitting a reduction in share premium account such that reserve could be treated as profits available for distribution - creditors duly notified - evidence heard and procedural developments - affidavit evidence of 'banking consultant' - test to be applied upon application for confirmation of a resolution reducing company capital - court's discretion - six factors - safeguarding of creditors - application of statutory provisions and test to facts presented - objector is not a creditor nor is he 'entitled to object' - company has more than adequate resources to meet reasonable claim that might be advanced by objector - purported 'expert' evidence made bizarre and extraordinary allegations unsupported by evidence - importance of persons held out as experts to act with independence and impartiality - principles applicable to responsibilities of expert witnesses
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.