Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Refusal of leave to appeal asylum decision where no point of law of exceptional public importance raised
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses to grant leave to appeal to Supreme Court a decision refusing a Georgian national judicial review of decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, on the grounds that the proposed appeal does not raise a point of law of exceptional public importance as the Supreme Court has already decided on rules relating to the severance of lawful reasons from unlawful reasons in administrative decisions.
Judicial review – asylum and immigration – application for leave to appeal to Supreme Court on a point of law of public importance - whether desirable in the public interest that an appeal should be taken - principles governing the grant of a certificate of appeal – Georgian national argued that the judge reinterpreted the decision of the Tribunal member and sought to characterise what the Tribunal member described as a credibility matter, as something else - severability of lawful reasons from unlawful reasons in administrative decisions.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
