Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has refused leave to seek judicial review of a Chief Superintendent's decision to deny firearm licences. The refusal was based on concerns for public safety, stemming from the applicant's failure to provide contact details for persons allegedly given his dogs after a reported incident. The applicant, who represented himself, had previously appealed a similar decision to the District Court without success and did not pursue an alternative statutory appeal before seeking judicial review. The court found no arguable case of a fundamental breach of fair procedures or lack of jurisdiction that would warrant bypassing the alternative remedy of a District Court appeal.
judicial review, firearm licence, public safety, Chief Superintendent, Equal Status Acts, reasonable accommodation, dyslexia, Firearms Act 1925, restricted firearms, District Court appeal, statutory appeal, fair procedures, jurisdiction, certiorari, legal remedies, Legal Services Regulation Act 2015.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.