Court of Appeal allows appeal from High Court, and remits for further determination the question of whether the Information Commissioner had erred in directing the release of correspondence between a government department and a private company that had been awarded a public contract, on the grounds that: (a) the commissioner had been incorrect in determining that such release should only be refused in 'exceptional circumstances'; and (b) it was not necessary to show that the release would 'totally undermine' the company's business if the release was refused on the grounds of commercial sensitivity.
Birmingham P (nem diss): Decision of Information Commissioner - appeal to High Court dismissed - application under Freedom of Information Act 2014 - records concerning appointment of company as 'Management Service Entity' of Metropolitan Area Networks - contracts between government department and appointed company - 'concession agreements' - refusal of records by Minister on grounds of confidentiality and commercial sensitivity - fear that release of records would affect company's ability to operate in a competitive manner - Freedom of Information Act 2014, s. 35(1)(b) and s. 36(1) - ruling by commissioner that minister release concession agreement to applicant - appeal on point of law - whether commissioner had substituted own test and criteria for that in statute - whether commissioner erred in placing onus of proof on Minister - whether commissioner had erred in misapplying public interest tests - nature of an appeal on a point of law - whether High Court wrongly applied judicial review principles - presumption under statute - presumption that refusal of FOI request was not justified - relevance or non-relevance of presumption.