Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Refusal of international protection to Algerian national was reasonable and lawful
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses judicial review of the decision refusing an Algerian national (who feared returning to Algeria as a failed asylum seeker) international protection, on the grounds that the International Protection Appeals Tribunal’s decision was intelligent, coherent, reasonable and lawful.
Judicial review – asylum and immigration – Algerian national challenging the decision refusing him international protection - claimed his brother was in a relationship with a Berber woman and was attacked - claimed that he was also attacked as a result of trying to stop the attack on the brother – came to the State by way of Spain, France and Belgium – refused asylum and subsidiary protection – risk to returning failed asylum seekers - alleged lack of proper consideration of risk to returnees – would not be identified as a failed asylum seeker - country of origin information - would be returned with no known profile and would be of no interest to the authorities – sufficient reasons offered - alleged improper distinguishing of a previous decision - no obligation to distinguish any previous decision - failure to exhibit the other decision - tribunal’s decision is intelligent, coherent, reasonable and lawful – judicial review refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
