Refusal of permission to reside in State was rational and reasonable

Judicial review – asylum and immigration – EU law – free movement of persons – Pakistani national challenging the decision of the Minister for Justice to uphold on review the decision refusing him permission to reside - failed to establish that he is a ‘permitted family member of his brother, a UK citizen – evidence of financial dependency – application refused – applied for review – review unsuccessful – proposed to make deportation order against him - relevant statutory provisions – whether the Minister applied an unduly narrow construction of the term ‘member of the household of the Union citizen’ – construction not antiquated or limited to the “traditional family” - must be at least one person in any family household, however constituted, with the necessary level of authority, responsibility or control to be the householder - failure to give reasons – alleged lack of clarity – onus on the Pakistani national to satisfy the Minister by cogent evidence that was in part documented and could be tested - typographical error - Minister provided clear and cogent reasons for the decision - lack of sufficient reasons – Minister not obliged to identify not only the manner in which any evidence presented falls short of proving any applicable requirement - unreasonableness or irrationality - audi alteram partem - no obligation on the Minister to put the views that the Minister had formed on the material that he had submitted to him for further comment or submission before making a decision on his application – judicial review refused –