Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants the registered owner of a property an interlocutory order to restrain the defendants from trespassing and to yield up possession, affirming the owner's title and rejecting the defendants' unsubstantiated claims of adverse possession. The defendants failed to provide credible evidence to support their occupancy claims, and their actions were found to obstruct the lawful efforts of the receivers and the plaintiff.
Interlocutory order - trespass - possession - registered owner - adverse possession - receivers - obstruction - lawful entitlement - stay on order - High Court - property rights - balance of justice - proportionality - damages as remedy - defendants' occupancy claims - unsubstantiated claims - plaintiff's title affirmed.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.