Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court orders the surrender of the respondent to the Republic of Lithuania on foot of a European Arrest Warrant, on the grounds that the respondent had failed to rebut the presumption that a decision has been made to charge the person and try him or her for the offence where the additional information confirmed that while a further step must be taken prior to charge i.e. the interview of the respondent, regardless of his answers in interview, which is a mandatory process, the indictment will be drawn up and the case will be referred to a court of trial.
European arrest warrant – authorities from Republic of Lithuania seeking the surrender of the respondent for prosecution in respect of alleged assault and robbery-type offences – points of objection – argued that the criminal complaint had been withdrawn - additional information - Olsson - presumption that a decision has been made to charge the person and try him or her for the offence - opening lines of the EAW itself, request that the person mentioned below “be arrested and surrendered for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution ...” – mutual trust and confidence - a court is only to refuse to surrender a requested person when it is satisfied that no decision has been made to charge or try that person - where there is no intention to try the requested person on the charges at the time the warrant is issued - must be strong and cogent evidence to rebut the presumption - while a further step must be taken prior to charge i.e. the interview of the respondent, regardless of his answers in interview, which is a mandatory process, the indictment will be drawn up and the case will be referred to a court of trial – surrender ordered
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.